Related articles:

Pima asks court to postpone release of election databases County records release ordered

Other articles by Andrea Kelly:

Drivers becoming riders Tucson ranks high in driving safety Planning to start for Kolb Road extension Road Runner by Andrea Kelly : You already have burned stimulus check funds RTA ups funding for 5 road projects Biodiesel powers Sun Tran Panel's vote could resolve Barraza-Aviation impasse Road Runner: Multiple monikers for streets a challenge City manager's shaky status revealed in bus-fare session Board OKs transit projects that rely on 1-cent sales tax

Trades/Construction
Pioneer Landscaping
Yard Person/Loader Operator Trades/Construction
Pioneer Landscaping
Yard Person/Loader Operator Driver/Transportation
RENZENBERGER
ROAD AND YARD VAN DRIVERS Trades/Construction
Baker Brothers Plumbing
Dry Wallers General
The Graham Group
Assistant to the Building Manager Driver/Transportation
CPC Southwest Materials
Drivers Production and Manufacturing
Pioneer Landscaping
Crushing Crew

Pima County will have to turn over electronic database records from past elections to the Pima County Democratic Party, a judge ruled Tuesday.

Pima County Superior Judge Michael Miller said the county must release records requested a year ago, including copies of the Diebold GEMS databases for the 2006 primary and general elections. That means means the democratic party will have a chance to inspect the records for potential security flaws.

The party requested the records to fulfill its duty of election monitoring, said the party’s attorney Bill Risner. The Pima County Democratic Party sued the county this year for the electronic databases from past elections.

The party requested the databases and passwords be released according to Arizona public records law. Pima County denied that part of the request, while turning over other records the party asked for.

In closing arguments of the four-day trial that began Dec. 4, Pima County argued the databases meet the definition of a computer program, which is protected by state law, said Deputy County Attorney Thomas Denker.

Releasing the databases could pose the risk of security flaws in future elections, Denker said. People could hack into the system and change the vote numbers or create fake ballots and submit them on election day, he said. There are also unknown risks associated with releasing the databases and associated passwords, he said.

“There is a significant risk these systems could be hacked or discredited,” Denker said.

The county was also concerned releasing the passwords for the databases would more easily allow someone to manipulate the results and claim different results than the county had on record, he said. There’s also no evidence the records requested would allow someone to discover fraud in an election, Denker said.

Risner said the case was about the freedoms American citizens have, and the ability to change the course of the system by voting.

“You get a cold sweat and think what if our vote was taken from us and then you think what if our vote has been taken from us,” Risner said.

He said the records should be released so the party can carry out its duty of monitoring elections to ensure they are transparent and secure.

While the county cited security issues as a reason the records should not be released, Risner said that’s the exact reason they should be released.

“Our political party wants to carry out its role of ensuring our votes’ accuracy,” he said.

Allowing political parties access to these databases would allow confirmation of vote counts and could lead to a better, more secure system in the the future, he said.