Related articles:

Gov. defends stance on DNA database

Other articles by Howard Fischer:

Failed legislative bill leaves public-financed campaigns in doubtBurns: Brewer bungling her job House approves boost in funding for those seeking office next year 3 recommended to Brewer to fill seat on high court AZ can enact own greenhouse gas regsRecession reins in sprawl Pet bills aplenty pouring forth from Legislature Brewer wants budget right away, but not those other, lesser bills Flat-tax plan could hit walletsRepeal of ban on sparklers nears final OK

Construction
West-Press
Printing Health Care
Sierra Tucson
Eating Disorders Program Coordinator Finance and Accounting
Charles E. Gillman Company
Accounting Specialist Administrative & Professional
Jorgensen Brooks Group
Counselor Health Care
Dependable Health Services
Physical Therapists Health Care
CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE
DIRECTOR OF HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Sales and Marketing
Everready Glass
Sales Reps

PHOENIX — Gov. Janet Napolitano defended her signing of legislation that allows, for the first time ever, the collection of DNA of people only accused of crimes and putting it into a statewide database.

Napolitano said Wednesday privacy concerns are over-blown. She said putting DNA on file is no more intrusive than the fingerprints already taken when people are arrested.

But that assessment is not shared by several legislators of both parties who said this is a major change in state policy, and one that should not have been pushed through as part of the $10.6 billion budget deal — but rather as separately debated legislation.

In fact, a separate bill to enact that change died earlier this year in the Senate.

Current law requires DNA samples only for people convicted of certain serious felonies, sex crimes and offenses involving deadly weapons or dangerous instruments. This measure extends that rule to those who have been arrested only on certain charges, ranging from homicide and child molestation to prostitution.

The idea behind the database is to provide samples police can compare with evidence at the scene of unsolved crimes.

It is that database that concerns Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix. The sample would remain there if the person were later acquitted, or was never formally charged, unless the person could convince a judge to remove it. "This is a very, very scary step toward a Big Brother state," she said.

Asked about that Wednesday, Napolitano said those fears are overblown. "When people get arrested now, they usually get fingerprinted," Napolitano said.

"So to me this is just an evolution of that process," the governor said. "I'm just not convinced that that is as Big Brotherish as your question implies."

But Rep. Eddie Farnsworth, R-Gilbert, rejected the comparison. "This isn't like a fingerprint," he said. "This is actually intruding on somebody's body to take a part of their body so that you can put it into a database to catch them in the future if they happen to commit a crime in the future."

Farnsworth said this is just another step toward the goal of some people to take DNA samples of all newborns for the government to keep on file "because some point down the road they may commit a crime."

Napolitano acknowledged the change in the law is part of the larger deal she approved to get a budget to her liking. That includes providing just $11 million in tax cuts rather than a $64 million package approved by the House.

The provision actually is being pushed by Rep. Chuck Gray, R-Mesa, a former police officer. He said it would improve public safety.

Gray said if such a database were already operating it would not have taken police so long to arrest a suspect in the case of the Baseline Rapist who is charged with nine deaths and multiple assaults in the Phoenix area.

But Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Gilbert, said that view distorts the role of government.

"The No. 1 job of government is to protect the rights of the citizens of the state," he said. "It's not public safety."