More Updates:

Man shot, killed by police on Tucson's South Side (UPDATED)Death of ex-NFL quarterback ruled a homicideOne person killed in crash near SonoitaTucson-area cops to join AG for crime forumRoad Runner by Andrea Kelly: Traffic laws we have forgottenWho are Tucson's rising stars?55 arrested in DUI stops across TucsonTucsonans share memories of man landing on the moonWalt Disney World monorail crash kills employeeTexas teen says father wrapped chain around himCalderon opponents poised to gain in vote for Mexican CongressToday's interactive map of crime in TucsonTucson gas-price tracker: StarNet helps you save at the pump

Related articles:

Affirmative-action opponents file suit to put ban on ballot Affirmative-action foes give up on 2008 ballot Anti-affirmative action fails, shy valid signatures for ballot

Administrative & Professional
Jorgensen Brooks Group
Counselor Sales and Marketing
Everready Glass
Sales Reps Trades/Construction
RANCHO RESORT
MAINTANANCE POSITION Mechanical
Komatsu Equipment Co
Resident Field Mechanic Finance and Accounting
Charles E. Gillman Company
Accounting Specialist Health Care
Sierra Tucson
Eating Disorders Program Coordinator Administrative & Professional
Tucson Urban League
CEO/President

PHOENIX — Opponents of Arizona’s Proposition 104 are going to court to keep the measure aimed at dismantling preferential treatment programs for women and minorities off the November general election ballot.

A group called Protect Arizona’s Freedom says it is filing a lawsuit challenging the validity of more than 100,000 signatures submitted by supporters to quality the initiative for the ballot.

The opponents say their challenge is based on “fraudulent and illegal signature-gathering tactics” and does not include signatures expected to be invalidated based on voter registration.

Proposition 104 would amend the Arizona Constitution to ban any hiring practices, university scholarships and other public programs that favor one group over others.