Most Recent Tucson Traffic Incidents3180 N CAMPBELL AV ,TUC DRUNK DRIVER STOPPED 02:11
updated every 5 minutes - incidents provided by transview.org
Dynamics Information Technology Systems Engineer Construction Green Valley Heating & Cooling HVAC Service Tech General Maintenance Technician Health Care VALOR HOSPICECARE ON-CALL NURSE General VALLEY PROTECTIVE SERVICES SECURITY OFFICERS Trades/Construction FAULK ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL Administrative & Professional Pima Prevention Partnership Administrative Assistant Hourly UpdateSupreme Court rejects Arizona case on fast tracked border fence near Naco2-mile stretch of fence has already been built
The Associated Press
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 06.23.2008
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a plea by environmental groups to rein in the Bush administration's power to waive laws and regulations to speed construction of a fence along the U.S.-Mexican border near Naco.
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has used authority given to him by Congress in 2005 to ignore environmental and other laws and regulations to move forward with hundreds of miles of fencing in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas.
The case rejected by the court involved a two-mile section of fence in the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area near Naco, Ariz. The section has since been built.
"I am extremely disappointed in the court's decision," Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said. "This waiver will only prolong the department from addressing the real issue: their lack of a comprehensive border security plan."
Thompson chairs the House Homeland Security Committee. He and 13 other House democrats — including six other committee chairs — filed a brief in support of the environmentalists' appeal.
Earlier this year, Chertoff waived more than 30 laws and regulations in an effort to finish building 670 miles of fence along the southwest border. Administration officials have said that invoking the legal waivers — which Congress authorized in 1996 and 2005 laws — will cut through bureaucratic red tape and sidestep environmental laws that currently stand in the way of fence construction.
|
|