More Updates:

Political Notebook: Grijalva for Interior Secretary?Obama economic plan aims for 2.5M new jobs by 2011Sundt Construction plans new Tucson office on NW sideTucson weekend: Tequila, the 'Man Show' guy and a worthy benefitMerry Fitzmas! It's the Obama Claus ornamentFamily outraged, distraught over teen’s Internet suicideOhio police think they've nabbed 'Granny Robber'Tucson police radar van locations this weekendTucson gas-price tracker: StarNet helps you save at the pumpBritish may ban 'happy hour' as drink deaths riseIs Alaska big enough for celebrity Palin?Ga. Army wife accused in arson that killed her 2 kidsJimmy Connors arrested in Santa Barbara

Education
Yavapai College
Teachers General
Prestige Maintenance USA
Area Manager Dental
Apache Dental
Porcelain Techs Health Care
Freedom Manor
Caregivers Health Care
Carondelet Foothills Surgery
Pre-Op Nurse Health Care
SOUTHERN ARIZONA ENDODONTICS I
NSURANCE PROCESSOR General
GROUNDS CONTROL
LANDCAPE FOREMAN & LABORERS

PHOENIX — An Arizona appellate court ruling says a state law on medical malpractice lawsuits is unconstitutional.

At issue is a law that sets qualifications required for expert witnesses in medical malpractice cases.

A three-judge panel of the state Court of Appeals says the law is unconstitutional because it violates the doctrine of separation between the branches of government.

The ruling Tuesday came in a Maricopa County case in which a trial judge dismissed a malpractice suit after ruling that a doctor that the plaintiff wanted to use as an expert witness was not qualified under the state law.