More Updates:

Man shot, killed by police on Tucson's South Side (UPDATED)Death of ex-NFL quarterback ruled a homicideOne person killed in crash near SonoitaTucson-area cops to join AG for crime forumRoad Runner by Andrea Kelly: Traffic laws we have forgottenWho are Tucson's rising stars?55 arrested in DUI stops across TucsonTucsonans share memories of man landing on the moonWalt Disney World monorail crash kills employeeTexas teen says father wrapped chain around himCalderon opponents poised to gain in vote for Mexican CongressToday's interactive map of crime in TucsonTucson gas-price tracker: StarNet helps you save at the pump

Related articles:

U.S. judge upholds Arizona's voter-identification laws Judge tosses several challenges to state voter-ID law

Other articles by Howard Fischer:

Failed legislative bill leaves public-financed campaigns in doubtBurns: Brewer bungling her job House approves boost in funding for those seeking office next year 3 recommended to Brewer to fill seat on high court AZ can enact own greenhouse gas regsRecession reins in sprawl Pet bills aplenty pouring forth from Legislature Brewer wants budget right away, but not those other, lesser bills Flat-tax plan could hit walletsRepeal of ban on sparklers nears final OK

Health Care
Sierra Tucson
Eating Disorders Program Coordinator Administrative & Professional
Jorgensen Brooks Group
Counselor Health Care
Dependable Health Services
Physical Therapists Construction
West-Press
Printing Health Care
CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE
DIRECTOR OF HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Mechanical
Komatsu Equipment Co
Resident Field Mechanic Administrative & Professional
Tucson Urban League
CEO/President

PHOENIX -- There's nothing illegal about requiring would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens, a federal judge has ruled.

U.S. District Court Judge Roslyn Silver rejected various contentions of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund that the requirements of a 2004 voter-approved measure are discriminatory or unconstitutional. These both require proof of citizenship to register and presentation of certain forms of identification to cast a ballot.

"Only citizens may vote," Silver wrote. "Requiring an individual to present proof of citizenship allows the state to determine if that individual is qualified to vote."

The decision, made available Wednesday, does not end the lawsuit. MALDEF has several other claims which, at least at this point, would have to be decided at a trial.

But Silver, in the new ruling, found nine of MALDEF's contentions so lacking in merit that she agreed with attorneys for the state that they should be thrown out even before a trial.

Nina Perales, MALDEF's regional counsel, said her organization took up the case because Hispanics are less likely to have the kinds of documents the state has determined are necessary to comply with Proposition 200. That, she said, means they are denied the right to vote.

But Perales said the issue crosses ethnic lines, saying anyone who is poor and does not have a driver's license -- one of the acceptable documents -- would be denied the right to vote.

That formed the basis of one of the claims: that the identification requirement amounted to an unconstitutional "poll tax," as people would need to purchase certain documents to vote.

Silver rejected that argument, saying that the requirement to prove citizenship with one or more acceptable documents does not rise to the level of a fee to vote.

The judge also rejected the argument that the requirement to show ID at the polls illegally creates two classes of people because there is no similar mandate for those who decide to vote early by mail. But Silver said there is nothing inherently illegal about Arizona setting up different practices and procedures for different types of voting.