Sat, Jul 05, 2008

Most Recent Tucson Traffic Incidents

2601 W BROADWAY BL #L498 ,TUC HAZARD 16:53
N SEMINOLE AV/W SPEEDWAY BL ,TUC ACCIDENT NO INJURY 16:29
N I10/W PRINCE RD ,TUC ACCIDENT UNKNOWN INJURIES 15:14
E GLENN ST/N TUCSON BL ,TUC ACCIDENT UNKNOWN INJURIES 14:58
E PRINCE RD/N STONE AV ,TUC ACCIDENT NO INJURY 13:03
N 6 AV/E SPEEDWAY BL ,TUC ACCIDENT NO INJURY 11:32
updated every 5 minutes - incidents provided by transview.org

Hourly Update

Audit faults paper trail on state's homeland security grants

By Paul Davenport
Associated Press
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 10.03.2006
PHOENIX - Arizona has awarded $175 million in federal homeland security grants since the Sept. 11 terror attacks without doing enough to ensure that it was properly awarded and spent, state auditors concluded Tuesday.
The awards of federal money to 200 state agencies and local governments included 450 projects in 2003-2005. The cash was spent on a wide array of items, ranging from protective gear for first responders to installation of video surveillance equipment for government facilities.
However, a special financial audit conducted by the legislature's Auditor General's Office said the Department of Emergency Management and the Office of Homeland Security in many cases either didn't document why projects received funding or if the money actually was spent for the approved purposes.
The special audit noted that only $1.4 million, or less than 1 percent of the $175 million, was spent by the state for management and administrative functions of the grant program.
Three previous reports issued in recent months by the Auditor General's Office and by two executive-branch agencies reached similar or overlapping conclusions. Department of Homeland Security Director Frank Navarrete said in a response accompanying the latest report that numerous corrective steps either had been taken or were under way.
Those steps include include consolidating the grant program in one agency, creating a new filing system for grant documentation, reconciling grant awards against reimbursement requirements and hiring a senior official to oversee financial aspects of the grant program, Navarrete said.
Several Republican legislators issued a statement saying the audit indicated an inability to communicate and a failure to focus the grant program.
"The state cannot provide even the most basic information about millions of dollars spent supposedly to protect us," said Rep. Laura Knaperek, R-Tempe.
Similar concerns about record-keeping and lack of oversight have been aired in such states as Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky. In Virginia, a state report found that a few localities misused money, spending it on such unauthorized items as ice-rescue equipment, ventilation fans and T-shirts.
The Arizona Department of Homeland Security itself was created under a law enacted earlier this year to effectively elevate the Office of Homeland Security to department status and formalize its creation. Gov. Janet Napolitano created the office by executive order several months after taking office in 2003.
The special audit was authorized by a legislative oversight committee in May at the request of House Speaker Jim Weiers, R-Phoenix.
Though Weiers said he wanted the audit partly to determine whether the state's grants were for federally permitted purposes, the report said the oversight committee did not ask for a detailed review of all projects.
The audit report said auditors examined 58 projects closely and found no unallowable spending. But it noted that lack of records and documentation prevented determinations on whether all projects were allowable.
The federal government's homeland security grant funding to the state has declined over time, starting at $57 million in 2003 and declining to $23.5 million by 2006.
Besides handling the allocation of homeland security dollars, the new department is responsible for developing a state homeland security strategy, coordinating with other state and federal agencies, conducting preparedness training exercises and helping prepare regional response plans.
The bill that created the department originally would have required that federal homeland security dollars sent to Arizona be subject to legislative appropriation. That is generally not done with federal money and would have been a change steadfastly opposed by Napolitano and her predecessors as an infringement on their executive-branch constitutional turf.
Numerous local officials testified against the bill at the Legislature, saying they feared it would cost them valuable input at the regional level on how to divvy up the dollars.
The enacted legislation did not include the appropriation requirement. Instead, it requires the department to report planned uses of the money to a state advisory council. As before, regional advisory councils make recommendations on spending priorities.