Most Recent Tucson Traffic Incidents5250 S CAMPBELL AV #10 ,TUC HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT NEG INJ 17:36
E 22 ST/S PANTANO PW ,TUC ACCIDENT WITH INJURIES 17:28
S I19/W VALENCIA RD ,TUC ACCIDENT NO INJURY 17:09
E GRANT RD/N ROSEMONT BL ,TUC ACCIDENT NO INJURY 15:13
1573 W AJO WY ,TUC ACCIDENT WITH INJURIES 14:04
E 22 ST/S ALVERNON WY ,TUC ACCIDENT UNKNOWN INJURIES 11:56
updated every 5 minutes - incidents provided by transview.org
DR. JAMES KNOCHEL DDS RECEPTIONIST General MG Properties Maintenance Supervisor Health Care Mirasol LPN Trades/Construction ROR Constrution Residential Framing Carpenters Trades/Construction Dickens Quality Demolition Project Manager Health Care Old Pueblo Family Planning Medical Assistant Dental Thomas Buza, DDA Dental Hygienist Hourly UpdateArizona alone in challenge against changes in No Child Left Behind ActArizona Daily Star
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 08.29.2006
Provisional changes in the part of the No Child Left Behind Act that slaps
failing and succeeding labels on schools are affecting nearly every state.
But among the four states bordering Mexico, Arizona seems to be the only one
arguing the law that reduces the amount of time English-language learners
have to master the language before their state assessment scores count.
Before the 2005-06 school year, ELL students in Arizona had three years to
become proficient before their scores counted towards Adequate Yearly
Progress, the federal criteria that grades districts and schools on their
rates of improvement. Now, ELL students only have two years to learn the
language, a change that is being challenged by state Superintendent Tom
Horne.
Last year, 237 schools in Arizona did not pass muster in the Adequate Yearly
Progress criteria. This year, figures from the state show that 650 out of
1,881 public schools will be classified as not making progress under federal
guidelines.
Of those 650 schools, 110 of them are affected by the new ELL standards.
Many of the others are affected by two other new changes - adding three
elementary grades to those already surveyed and requiring special-education
students not on federally-approved assistance to take the test.
Horne is taking the issue to federal court, he said, because he "they made
an agreement with me (to allow ELL students three years to learn English),
and now they’re reneging on that agreement."
Unfortunately for the 110 schools affected by the change, appeals will be
denied by Horne "because if we don’t follow their (federal) rules, we'll get
fined," he said. But if Horne is successful in his lawsuit, the appeals
could be heard.
Two of the border states, Texas and New Mexico, are not affected by the law
change because they give their state assessment tests in Spanish and
English, which means a student doesn't need to have a high level of English
proficiency to pass the tests.
"That can make a big difference," said Texas Education Agency spokeswoman
BeEtta Culbertson.
California requires all students to pass the state test in English, but ELL
students' test scores have counted after their first year since the
introduction of No Child Left Behind, said Bill Padia, that state's deputy
superintendent for assessment and accountability.
"It's not an issue for us," he said.
Horne said that while it's possible for ELL students to become proficient in
English after their first year, passing a test in English at that time is
another matter.
"No person with common sense can believe a person can come here from Mexico
and pass the AIMS test in three years," Horne said. "They're saying that if
you have a significant number of ELL students, we condemn you to failure, no
matter how good you are."
School labels are expected to be released to the public Friday.
Contact reporter Jeff Commings at jcommings@azstarnet.com or (520) 573-4191.
|