Fri, Jul 04, 2008
Facing blinding dust clouds, U.S. soldiers wait for detainees to be transported by helicopter to Al Qaim base for questioning during Operation Steel Curtain.
courtesy of think Film Company
Watch Phil Villarreal's review

Caliente

Grim 'Taxi to the Dark Side' exposes U.S. torture

By Phil Villarreal
Pvillarreal@azstarnet.com
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 04.03.2008
A brutal, uncompromising exposé on sadistic American interrogation practices in the war on terror, the best-documentary Oscar winner "Taxi to the Dark Side" is tough to watch.
Showing none of the restraint for gory detail that network news displayed when the stories broke, Alex Gibney ("Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room") directs and narrates a dry but meticulously researched study of American cruelty and dishonesty. Gibney includes disturbing photos of nude, battered corpses and interviews with convicted interrogators bitter that they took the fall for their commanders.
Gibney chronicles the New York Times investigation into the military's torture practices. Officials deflected accusations and then, when the accusations could no longer be denied due to photographic evidence, pinned most of the blame on those at lower levels, diverting the blame from high command.
The film proves, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Americans have tortured captors in myriad ways, including sexual degradation, water boarding, sleep and sensory deprivation and chaining men to ceilings. The inhumane treatment was eerily similar at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan, Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and at Guantanamo Bay.
Even if you believe that terrorists deserve whatever comes to them, the problem — well-validated by mounds of evidence — is that innocents have been caught in the net.
The film's title is based on the plight of Dilawar, a probably harmless Afghani taxi cab driver who, along with three fares, was captured and locked away by American forces in late 2002. He died after a few days, his legs beaten into mush.
Although the documentary is solid, it doesn't take long before its finger-wagging seems as ineffective as the interrogation techniques it decries. Past the illuminating first half-hour, all the piling on does little to further shock or disgust you, and the movie contains few revelations that weren't made public months or years ago.
Gibney might have added more punch by beefing up a political angle he only brushes upon: that the Bush administration saw the backlash coming and made moves to protect itself from legal ramifications of the methods it may have secretly advocated.
There seems to be far more shrouded in darkness than Gibney's flashlight reveals.