![]() This house, at 4578 S. Oakenwald Ave. in Chicago, is at the center of a dispute between Ticor Title and Countrywide Home Loans.
Chicago Tribune 2008 file photo
A1 Communications Cable Techs Health Care Sierra Tucson Eating Disorders Program Coordinator Trades/Construction RANCHO RESORT MAINTANANCE POSITION BusinessTitle company's suit blames CountrywideTicor says lender at fault in possible landmark action
Chicago Tribune
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 08.22.2008
It could be the tip of an iceberg.
Ticor Title, one of the largest title insurance firms in the country, is suing Countrywide Home Loans, the nation's largest home lender, saying it shouldn't have to pay out on a title policy because of Countrywide's gross negligence.
The suit, filed last month in Cook County Chancery Court, concerns just one Chicago mortgage made by Countrywide in 2007, but the implications are enormous, real estate and title-insurance experts say.
If title insurers refuse to honor their policies, "you would have chaos," predicted Chicago real estate attorney Tom McNulty of Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg. The fate of tens of thousands of troubled properties around the country would be thrown into limbo while lenders and title insurers duke it out. Other deals would be held up because buyers and sellers would be reluctant to move forward without title insurance to protect their investments.
When it works smoothly, title insurance protects lenders and borrowers against losses arising from flaws in the property's title, which traces the chain of ownership. Problems can arise from forged signatures, unpaid taxes or liens. When fraud is involved and a clean title never passes to the new owner, the title insurer may be on the hook for the entire amount of the mortgage loan plus legal fees.
The case that Ticor has drawn a line in the sand over concerns a $360,000 first mortgage on a gray-stone Victorian home in the Kenwood neighborhood on Chicago's South Side. The story of that loan was told in a front-page Chicago Tribune story in February, several weeks after a clothed, mummified male corpse was discovered in the boarded-up house by a real estate speculator who had bought the property from Countrywide in a foreclosure auction.
The corpse was later identified as that of Randy Johnson, who grew up in the house and continued to live there until he disappeared in late 2005.
The gruesome discovery prompted Cook County Public Administrator Michael Bender to look into the case. Bender's staff quickly determined the backdated deed that had transferred the home from Johnson's deceased mother, Arrellia Johnson, to a woman named Rhonda Evans was a fake, and not all that hard to spot.
Arrellia Johnson's name was spelled two ways, and the alleged 1996 warranty deed was created on the stationery of Recorder of Deeds Eugene Moore, who did not take office until 1999. Another warning sign: The deed was notarized by Mae Evans, who is the mother of Rhonda Evans.
Three months after the fraudulent deed was recorded, Evans sold the house to Donald Franklin of Harvey, Ill., for $450,000. Franklin borrowed the entire amount in two simultaneous mortgages from Countrywide.
The public administrator, who handles the affairs of people with assets who die without wills, moved to intervene in Countrywide's foreclosure case and asked the court to restore the property's title to Arrellia Johnson's heirs. Four days later, Countrywide asked its title insurer, Ticor, to represent its interest in the case.
Ticor refused.
In the suit, Ticor argues that Countrywide was "reckless and grossly negligent in its underwriting of the Franklin mortgage." That carelessness is the only cause of any loss suffered by the lender, Ticor alleges.
Its claims go further: Ticor alleges that Countrywide "adopted corporate policies that resulted in the abandonment of proper underwriting standards as part of its effort to increase market share, and in the short term, profits."
In refusing to pay off on its policy, Ticor is waging an uphill battle, title insurance experts say.
"Ticor was expected to have done its job before it issued the insurance policy. Once it does that, it's a written contract and everything else irrelevant," said Barry Epstein, a forensic accountant and litigation consultant in Chicago. "Now they're shocked that Countrywide might be sloppy, but that's what they were supposed to check out before issuing the policy. . . . If the policy is valid, they are going to have to pay."
|
|