Related articles:

Napolitano vetoes immigration/border security bill Napolitano derails GOP measure on border security Veto likely on GOP immigration bill Lawmakers make border-bill concession Audio report: Napolitano signals readiness to veto border billArizona Republicans assembling 'comprehensive' immigration bill Lawmakers question veto of border bill Illegal immigration affects everyoneLegislature sends immigration bill to governorMeasure would provide money for National Guard troops along border

Other articles by Howard Fischer:

Brewer is advised to keep some state appointees in place Renewed interest in 'lieutenant governor' title Havasupai get go-ahead to sue universities State tax revenues far below projections Arizona, local housing numbers get darker McCain plans to run for 5th Senate term Ample perils lurk in toys geared to totsMcCain says he will run for re-election in 2010 State treasurer against levies on local funds US Airways allowed to lay off pilots from old America West

Education
Assessment Technology, Inc
Social Studies Content Writer General
CORT
WAREHOUSE/DRIVER General
CORT
Warehouse Supervisor Health Care
Rio Salado College
PA's/Online Instructors Construction
Komatsu Equipment Co
Mechanic

PHOENIX — Gov. Janet Napolitano vetoed what sponsors labeled a comprehensive border-security and immigration measure Tuesday, calling it not only "weak and ineffective" but saying it would have provided amnesty to companies that hire illegal entrants.

The move, which set a veto record for an Arizona governor, came as no surprise. Napolitano had previously vetoed some of the provisions sent to her individually.

But the veto provoked an angry reaction from Republican legislators, who said her action showed she is not really interested in stemming the flow of 5,000 to 10,000 people a day who cross the border illegally. Those lawmakers are considering putting at least some parts of the measure on the fall ballot and bypassing the governor.

Rep. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who put much of the plan together, called Napolitano "the best friend illegal aliens have." And Sen. Barbara Leff, R-Paradise Valley, said the veto "shows the governor does not want to do anything about illegal immigration."

Napolitano, however, noted that she told lawmakers in a prior veto that it is unconstitutional to allow people who are in this country in violation of federal law to be arrested and prosecuted under state law as trespassers. Her staffers also distributed a list of police departments and county attorneys that urged her to veto the measure.

The governor, in her two-page veto message, opened up a new front in the war of words with lawmakers.

She said a provision that backers said would punish companies that knowingly hire illegal immigrants was not only toothless but actually amounted to amnesty.

"All the employer must do to claim this amnesty is fire the illegal worker within 10 days of receiving a cease-and-desist order from the attorney general," Napolitano wrote. "Under this bill, an employer that simply complies with the order upon receipt pays no fine, risks no jail time and can continue with normal business operations as if nothing has happened."

And Napolitano said the chances of a company's even getting such an order is minimal at best. She said that Attorney General Terry Goddard had said he would need $11 million annually to audit up to 5 percent of companies with state licenses. Lawmakers provided just $2 million.

Senate President Ken Bennett said that was patently false.

He said companies that hire illegal immigrants "under the table" and don't collect taxes are subject to fines and even mandatory jail time. They could even lose their licenses to do business in Arizona.

"There's not much more that you can do to a business than take away their right to operate," he said. "Anyone, including the governor, who is saying that this is employer amnesty is hiding behind the facts and not telling the people of Arizona the real truth."

Pearce said he would have preferred to do more. But he cited a section of federal law that limits the ability of states to impose civil or criminal penalties against companies that employ illegal immigrants.

The veto left supporters of the package wondering what to do next.

One option is to bypass the governor and put the measure on the November ballot. But Republican leaders conceded Tuesday that they hadn't decided which of the bill's many elements should be presented to voters.

Aside from the trespass and employer-sanction provisions, the measure would have provided $50 million to buy or lease radar units to spot border crossers and $10 million to station Arizona National Guard troops along the border.

Napolitano actually sought both in her State of the State speech in January. But she now says federal action eliminates the need to spend state taxpayer money.

Other provisions included money to hire more Department of Public Safety officers; expand a special Gang and Immigration Task Force; and provide $55 million to communities to deal with border issues.

It also would have expanded Proposition 200, approved by voters in 2004, to deny adult-education classes, subsidized child care and lower in-state tuition at universities and community colleges to those not here legally — items that Sen. Dean Martin, R-Phoenix, called "taxpayer subsidies for illegal immigrants."

That initiative was billed as denying public services to those not in this country legally. But a legal opinion from Goddard narrowed its scope to make only a few programs off-limits.

Napolitano did not address those issues in her veto, preferring to concentrate on what she said were flaws in the section dealing with employer sanctions.