www.azstarnet.com
  VIEW FORECAST
Home | Message Board | Links | Contact us
April 11, 2000

2 states differ on bilingual ed’s value

Jeffry Scott/Staff

English immersion: Californian Daisy Ortega is copying a story written by her teacher to help her learn English.

By Sarah Tully Tapia
Arizona Daily Star

California rejects it, Florida schools embrace it, and in these states Arizonans can see which way they can go if they vote this fall to keep or kill bilingual education.

California voters ordered their schools in 1998 to stop instruction in any language other than English because of their frustration that too many children never gain a working knowledge of the language — or even their native language — when schools teach them in both.

Miami, Fla., residents, on the other hand, are pushing their schools to produce as many bilingual graduates as they can, for economic reasons. The city wants to stop recruiting workers outside the country.

A Tucson-based group, English for the Children-Arizona, is trying to put a measure similar to California’s on the Nov. 7 ballot in Arizona. It would require the state’s 139,000 limited-English speakers, one in five state students, to catch up within a year in English-only classes.

English for the Children-Arizonapoints to success stories already being reported in places like the Oceanside Unified School District near San Diego.

In the mostlyMexican-immigrant community, children in English immersion are raising test scores and whizzing through grade-level books by the second grade. Before, third graders were just starting to write simple sentences in English, such as filling in the blanks after “I like ... .”

“My first experience with immersion is it works,” said Superintendent Kenneth Noonan, formerly a supporter of bilingual education.

Miami residents say they can’t understand why anyone opposes bilingual education.

Miami-Dade County Public Schools are expanding model language programs so that students can take half of their subjects in English and the rest in other languages.

The programs are for native English speakers who are trying to learn other languages, as well as for students who speak little English. English for the Children-Arizona would prohibit such an approach.

“I think one fallacy is, we continue to think in this country that it’s either-or,”said Lourdes Rovira, the Miami bilingual education director. “Children don’t have a problem acquiring two or three languages at the same time.”

 

 

All content copyright © 1999, 2000, 2001 AzStarNet , Arizona Daily Star and its wire services and suppliers and may not be republished without permission. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution, or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the expressed written consent of Arizona Daily Star or AzStarNet is prohibited.


Message board:
Bilingual Education vs. Language Immersion

How do you feel about bilingual education?

Is it fair that some students receive instruction in two languages and others do not?

Foreign language instruction in other countries begins early, why not here?

Add a new topic


Graphics

English instruction: What the experts say

Students speaking little or no English


Glossary

Bilingual education: An instructional program for students with limited-English skills that uses the students’ native language part of the time.

Dual-language program: A type of bilingual education that teaches students skills in two languages. Usually, the classes are evenly divided between students who speak English and those who speak another language.

English as a Second Language, or ESL: A program that instructs limited-English-proficient students in the English language. Little or no instruction is given in a language other than English. Most commonly, students attend ESL classes for part of the day and spend the rest of their time in regular classes.

Immersion: A program that teaches limited-English-proficient children without using their native languages.