Sen. Jon Kyl, an Arizona Republican, is serving his third term in the U.S. Senate.

Related articles:

Readers assail Kyl's position on drug prices CBO: Medicare drug-price dickering useless House OKs Medicare Rx cost shift

Finance and Accounting
Charles E. Gillman Company
Accounting Specialist Sales and Marketing
Everready Glass
Sales Reps Mechanical
Komatsu Equipment Co
Resident Field Mechanic Administrative & Professional
Jorgensen Brooks Group
Counselor Administrative & Professional
Tucson Urban League
CEO/President Trades/Construction
RANCHO RESORT
MAINTANANCE POSITION

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed a bill requiring the secretary of health and human services to "negotiate" Medicare prescription drug prices. The idea appears simple: The government would use its bargaining clout to force pharmaceutical companies to give seniors deep discounts. The idea, however, is neither simple nor realistic. Nor is it needed, given the success of Medicare Part D.

The Medicare drug benefit is exceeding everyone's best expectations. Enrollment continues to climb, with 33 million beneficiaries receiving benefits under Medicare Part D. The average savings is $1,200, and the average premium is only $22 for 2007 — 42 percent lower than initially projected.

Medicare costs are $189 billion less than anticipated, producing real savings for American taxpayers. Moreover, beneficiary satisfaction is high, with eight out of 10 beneficiaries satisfied with their Part D coverage.

Part D's success raises the old maxim: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

So, how does Medicare get the best deal for its beneficiaries? The answer is simple: competition and choice. However, others would prefer restricting drug choice and setting prices.

Congressional Democrats frequently cite the health benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs as evidence that direct government interference leads to lower prices. While the VA provides important health benefits to millions of veterans, there are serious problems with trying to mirror Medicare after the VA.

Negotiations involve trade-offs. The VA negotiates with drug companies by offering the following deal: If you sell your drug at a deep discount, we will buy a lot of it and won't buy a similar drug from any of your competitors.

Government buying, like the VA's, leads to rationing and limits on choice. Medicare Part D, however, promotes competition and choice. A variety of private drug plans ensures that each of the available drugs is included in one plan or another — letting the consumer choose which one best suits his or her health-care needs.

Unlike the federal government, private drug plans, similar to those offered under Medicare Part D, bear substantial financial risk and, therefore, have strong incentives to negotiate favorable discounts and offer drug coverage that attracts and retains enrollees.

As the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office concluded recently, the health secretary "would be unable to negotiate prices across the broad range of covered Part D drugs that are more favorable than those obtained by prescription drug plans under current law."

The Washington Post highlighted the VA program's major deficiency in a recent editorial: "Fully 3,000 of the 4,300 medicines covered by Medicare are unavailable under the veterans' program."

Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt recently pointed out that even Lipitor, a top-selling cholesterol-lowering drug, is excluded from the VA's drug benefit. This may explain why more than 1 million veterans now choose to receive their prescription drug coverage through Medicare — a clear suggestion that they prefer Medicare's plan choices and competitive market prices.

In the coming weeks, the Senate will consider a Democratic leadership bill to force the health secretary to negotiate drug prices for Medicare. It is a bad idea. Economic experts, patient-advocacy groups and business leaders agree that it will not lower prices, but will limit choice.

Competition and choice, not government interference, is the best way to provide drugs at the best prices.