Other articles by Howard Fischer:

Vouchers for private schools ruled out Governor vetoes bill voiding vehicle emission standards State, Tucson jobless rates dip a bit Arizona jobless rate improved in April, but fewer looking Some nurse practitioners can do first-term abortions, board says Gov. defends agreement with builders on road tax Napolitano diverts $1.6M from Arpaio Senate OKs AIMS graduation bill Legislature votes to overturn emissions standards Schools can order uniforms for kids, Circuit Court rules

Health Care
Visiting Angels
Caregivers Education
Indian Oasis Baboquivari Unified School District
Teachers / Principals Trades/Construction
Paragon Electric
Electricians General
Chapel Haven West
Program Staff Driver/Transportation
Pioneer Landscaping
Drivers/End-Dumps Dental
Dr. John Carson, DDS, PC
Dental Asst/Treatment Coordinator Trades/Construction
arizona portland cement
maintenance electrician

PHOENIX — State lawmakers took the first steps Tuesday to virtually guarantee public access to CPS files when children are killed or very seriously injured.

Legislation being crafted by members of the House Committee on Government would require Child Protective Services to release its records to anyone making a request in the case of a fatality or near-fatality. Files could be kept confidential only if CPS or prosecutors could show disclosure would cause specific material harm to an ongoing investigation.

The measure would allow anyone who has been denied access to ask a judge to intercede.

Other legislation being drafted by the panel includes:

● Requiring all court proceedings involving termination of parental rights and making children dependents of the state be presumed to be open.

● Expanding the files that are available to inspection by police and prosecutors who get a court order.

● Setting up new procedures to ensure CPS workers inform police when a child who is the subject of one of their investigations turns up missing.

● Providing more public access to the personnel records of not just CPS workers but all state employees.

Rep. Jonathan Paton, R-Tucson, said the changes are designed to allow more scrutiny of how CPS operates, not just by the public but also the Legislature.

Paton said it took a lawsuit by the Arizona Daily Star to force CPS to provide the records of two Tucson cases involving the deaths of three children. And he said it was only because those records are now public that lawmakers have the chance to examine how CPS functions and recommend changes.

"The bills we are discussing are opening up the process . . . so we can have a real debate," Paton said.

Rep. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, cautioned his colleagues against overreacting to some high- profile incidents and making too much information public.

"I think sunshine is important to be able to try to improve the process," he said.

"But in the process of opening up to sunshine, we don't want to open up the kids to sunburn," Farley continued. He said children who are the subject of some of these inquiries are innocent of any wrongdoing and vulnerable.

"Any information that comes out in the public, particularly in high-profile cases, is something that's going to mark those kids for life, and it's not their fault," he said. "So I think we have to be careful of how those kids are revealed and what's revealed."

Farley said that's true even in cases where a child has died, as there may be a sibling still at home.

Paton said the measures are not designed to punish CPS even though the agency has been under intense scrutiny by legislators, scrutiny that predates the deaths last year of Brandon Williams and Ariana and Tyler Payne.

The proposals have some limits on public access to CPS records.

The proposal to require open court hearings could be overruled by a judge, after considering factors including the "best interest" of the child, how an open hearing would endanger the child's physical or emotional condition and whether an open hearing would endanger the safety of any person.

Even if a hearing is open, anyone in attendance is prohibited from disclosing any personal identifying information about any of the parties outside the courtroom.

But there would be no such restrictions on information that would be publicly available on state employees.

Under current interpretations of the law, the state provides basic information on state workers, including their names, salaries and positions. What's not disclosed now, Paton said, are disciplinary actions.

Paton said that is crucial in finding out whether a CPS worker who followed improper procedures in handling a case has a history of similar problems.