Related articles:

State hopes to overturn new children's health program limits Coalition of states to challange Bush administration over children's health insurance Maryland joins Arizona and other states seeking expanded health coverage for childrenGov. decries Bush veto of health program for kidsGovernor says restrictions on health care for children unfairMaryland joins AZ, other states seeking expanded health coverage for children

Other articles by Howard Fischer:

Burns: Brewer bungling her job House approves boost in funding for those seeking office next year 3 recommended to Brewer to fill seat on high court AZ can enact own greenhouse gas regsRecession reins in sprawl Pet bills aplenty pouring forth from Legislature Brewer wants budget right away, but not those other, lesser bills Flat-tax plan could hit walletsRepeal of ban on sparklers nears final OK Ballot-imposed limits on lawmakers battled

Trades/Construction
RANCHO RESORT
MAINTANANCE POSITION General
A1 Communications
Cable Techs Health Care
Sierra Tucson
Eating Disorders Program Coordinator

PHOENIX — Arizona and at least seven other states are asking a federal judge to overturn new regulations by the Bush administration limiting the growth of the federal children's health program.

The lawsuit charges the administration illegally changed the rules of the State Children's Health Insurance Program without going through the required procedures. Those changes will make it more difficult for states to expand their programs to cover children in families earning less than 250 percent of the federal poverty level, about $51,625 for a family of four.

Those changes currently have no effect in Arizona. The Legislature has refused to expand the program here, known as Kids Care, beyond 200 percent of the federal poverty level.

But Jeanine L'Ecuyer, press aide to Gov. Janet Napolitano said political conditions might someday exist where Arizona might want to enroll more children.

L'Ecuyer said Arizona is joining the effort to get a federal judge to overturn those Bush administration rules because "it's the right thing to do."

The federal Medicaid program — known as the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System here — provides free care to anyone in families earning below the federal poverty level. That translates to $20,650 for a family of four.

S-CHIP covers children in families above that income level, with the federal government providing $3 for every $1 the state puts up.

States have been allowed to have eligibility as high as 350 percent of the federal poverty level, more than $72,000 a year for a family of four.

Arizona's Kids Care program, with its 200 percent cap, covers about 65,500 children in families who earn up to twice the poverty level.

Napolitano wanted to raise the cap to 300 percent, but couldn't get the Legislature to hear her proposal.

The new administration rules effectively limit the programs to 250 percent of the federal poverty level by imposing new requirements on states wanting to go above that.

Tim Nelson, the governor's chief legal adviser, said the states that are suing contend the administration did not follow the legal requirements for changing the regulations. That includes seeking public input.

Nelson said technically speaking, Arizona will not be a full-fledged plaintiff in the lawsuit. Instead, he said Arizona will provide legal briefs in support of the leading states including New York and New Jersey.

The litigation comes as the Democrat-controlled Congress is fighting with the administration about how much money to allocate to continue or expand the program.

Bush has asked for a $5 billion increase over the next five years. But the Congressional Budget Office has argued it will take $14 billion just to keep the program operating at current levels.

Congressional Democrats are pushing for at least $35 billion more to expand the program, with the money coming from higher tobacco taxes.