![]()
Construction on Vistoso Memorial Chapel
is under way in the wake of legal action by residents who opposed a crematorium at 2285 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd.
Jim Davis / Arizona Daily Star
Tucson Urban League CEO/President Finance and Accounting Charles E. Gillman Company Accounting Specialist Administrative & Professional Jorgensen Brooks Group Counselor Sales and Marketing Everready Glass Sales Reps Trades/Construction RANCHO RESORT MAINTANANCE POSITION Mechanical Komatsu Equipment Co Resident Field Mechanic NorthwestCrematorium must pay legal feesARIZONA DAILY STAR
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 07.05.2007
A group of Oro Valley residents who went to court opposing the development of a Rancho Vistoso funeral chapel and crematorium do not have to pay the business owners' attorney's fees, a Superior Court judge decided last week.
The Harpold family, which is building Vistoso Memorial Chapel at 2285 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd., sought some $25,000 in legal fees from the residents who have been trying to fight the development.
"We went through all the proper channels and then had to defend ourselves in court," said Douglas Harpold.
Judge John F. Kelly awarded $185 in court costs but not the attorney fees, said Tom Parsons, one of the Stubbs & Schubart attorneys who represented Harpold Real Estate and Vistoso Memorial Chapel. "Of course, we abide by the judge's decision," he said.
The residents — Gregory D. Santoro and Larry and Brenda Ryan — earlier this year took the town of Oro Valley to court to try to compel a town administrative board to hear their appeals.
They had tried multiple times to appeal the town's decision that a crematorium is a permitted use in the Rancho Vistoso site's zoning. But the town refused the appeals each time, citing a lack of administrative remedies open to them.
The residents filed their appeals four months too late, Kelly said in May, and he dismissed the case.
Only the town of Oro Valley was a defendant in the lawsuit, but the Harpolds entered the suit as intervenors, since their business was at the center of the controversy.
After the first case ended, the Harpolds sued the residents for their legal fees.
But Kelly, ruling from the bench, said the residents do not have to pay.
"In terms of the ruling regarding the attorney fees, we definitely agree" with the judge's decision, said Katharina Richter, who represented Santoro and the Ryans in both cases.
● Contact reporter Danielle Sottosanti at 618-1922 or at dsottosanti@azstarnet.com.
|
|