Related articles:

Head of Maricopa County NAACP pans plan to ban race, sex-based preferences

Other articles by Howard Fischer:

Burns: Brewer bungling her job House approves boost in funding for those seeking office next year 3 recommended to Brewer to fill seat on high court AZ can enact own greenhouse gas regsRecession reins in sprawl Pet bills aplenty pouring forth from Legislature Brewer wants budget right away, but not those other, lesser bills Flat-tax plan could hit walletsRepeal of ban on sparklers nears final OK Ballot-imposed limits on lawmakers battled

Health Care
Sierra Tucson
Eating Disorders Program Coordinator General
A1 Communications
Cable Techs Trades/Construction
RANCHO RESORT
MAINTANANCE POSITION

PHOENIX — The architect of laws banning race- and sex-based preferences in three states is taking the first steps today to get voters here to enact a similar measure.

Ward Connerly will be partnering with Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas in seeking to amend the state constitution to bar special — and advantageous — treatment for any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin. The measure would cover public employment, contracts and education.

It might include more: Thomas said he may include language that outlaws what he said are race-based courts, where criminal defendants are given different — and he believes preferential — treatment.

Connerly was the driving force behind a 1996 California measure that banned such preferences. Since then, as co-founder of the American Civil Rights Institute, he has pushed through similar proposals in Washington and Michigan.

Today's action is part of a nationwide drive by Connerly. He already is moving to put similar measures on the November 2008 ballot in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Colorado and Missouri.

Thomas said Arizona needs to be part of that effort. "It's important to make clear in our state constitution that there will be equal justice and equal treatment under law," he said.

He could not list specific laws or government policies that would become illegal.

But Clint Bolick with the Goldwater Institute, who also is joining in the initiative drive, said he already is investigating scholarships and clubs at state universities that appear to discriminate. He also said it appears some cities give preferences in public contracts to businesses owned by women or minorities.

A constitutional amendment would require the signatures of at least 230,047 registered voters by July 2008 to qualify for the ballot.

The measure actually is being proposed by the American Civil Rights Coalition, the political arm of the institute Connerly founded. He also is chairman of the coalition.

Jennifer Gratz, director of state and local initiatives for the coalition, said the Arizona measure will be patterned after the ones approved in the three other states. But Thomas said the exact language will be tailored to fit Arizona's needs.

Thomas has been battling Maricopa County Superior Court over what he calls "race-based" courts for those charged with drunken driving and special programs for those who have been convicted of repeat offenses. Court officials say programs aimed at people with different cultural and linguistic backgrounds help them complete probation.

A federal judge earlier this year refused to block the courts, saying Thomas has no legal right to sue. That case is now before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.